FabDigitFabDigit

PA6 vs PA610

Polymer · grade comparison

PA6 and PA610 are both polymer grades. PA6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PA610, about 29% more; tensile strength follows at 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi). In exchange, PA610 is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 60% for PA6. PA610 is lighter (1.08 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA6) and PA6 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, PA6 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PA610 (premium, $$$).

PA6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PA610Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA6 vs PA610: properties

PA6PA610

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.65 Msi
4 GPa0.51 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
120%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
1.9 GPa0.28 Msi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Shore D

81 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

82 HRM
75 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

119 HRR
111 HRR

Same in both: Izod Impact, Notched 55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

220°C428 °F
222°C432 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
50°C122 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.7%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

9%
3%

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
95 µm/m·K52.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

170°C338 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

65°C149 °F
58°C136 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

190°C374 °F
200°C392 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
25%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.7
3.4

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.025 · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
72 / 100

Weldability

62 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
1.4%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

80°C176 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 260°C500 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.6 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

938 kJ/m³
765 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA6PA610

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA6PA610
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PA6 vs PA610 — frequently asked

Is PA6 stronger than PA610?

Yes. PA6 has a typical yield strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PA610 — about 29% more. Tensile strength is 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA6 or PA610?

PA6 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PA610 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PA6 or PA610?

PA610. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (62/100) for PA6.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA6 and PA610 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.