FabDigitFabDigit

PA12 vs PA6

Polymer · grade comparison

PA12 and PA6 are both polymer grades, both engineering plastic. PA6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA12, about 88% more; tensile strength follows at 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). PA6 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 18% for PA12. PA12 is lighter (1.01 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA6) and PA6 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.7 GPa). On the shop floor, PA6 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PA12 (standard, $$).

PA12Choose it when weight is the constraint.

PA6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PA12 vs PA6: properties

PA12PA6

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
60%

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

77 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

106 HRR
119 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
82 HRM

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.01 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

180°C356 °F
220°C428 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

45°C113 °F
58°C136 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.5%
9%

Refractive Index

—
1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

105 µm/m·K58.3 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

165°C329 °F
170°C338 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

90°C194 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
190°C374 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
24%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.025

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.2%

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
260°C500 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
80°C176 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

138 MJ/kg59,329 BTU/lb
125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 7.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

471 kJ/m³
938 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA12PA6

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA12PA6
3D printingYes—
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, UV Coating.

PA12 vs PA6 — frequently asked

Is PA6 stronger than PA12?

Yes. PA6 has a typical yield strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA12 — about 88% more. Tensile strength is 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA12 or PA6?

PA6 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PA12 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PA12 or PA6?

PA6, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 68/100 against 60/100 for PA12.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA12 and PA6 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.