FabDigitFabDigit

PA11 vs PA6

Polymer · grade comparison

PA11 and PA6 are both polymer grades, both engineering plastic. PA6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11, about 88% more; tensile strength follows at 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). PA6 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 45% for PA11, and PA6 is harder (81 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). PA11 is lighter (1.03 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA6) and PA6 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PA6 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PA11 (premium, $$$).

PA11Choose it when weight is the constraint.

PA6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PA11 vs PA6: properties

PA11PA6

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
60%

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

47 MPa6.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
119 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Strength

—
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
82 HRM

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in · Izod Impact, Notched 55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.03 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

188°C370 °F
220°C428 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

46°C115 °F
58°C136 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.9%
9%

Refractive Index

—
1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

180°C356 °F
170°C338 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
190°C374 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
24%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.025

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
62 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
260°C500 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Formability (cold)

—
60 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 1.2%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
7.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
5%

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.6 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

500 kJ/m³
938 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA11PA6

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA11PA6
3D printingYes—
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, UV Coating.

PA11 vs PA6 — frequently asked

Is PA6 stronger than PA11?

Yes. PA6 has a typical yield strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11 — about 88% more. Tensile strength is 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA11 or PA6?

PA6 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PA11 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PA11 or PA6?

PA11. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (62/100) for PA6.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA11 and PA6 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.