FabDigitFabDigit

ECTFE vs FEP

Polymer · grade comparison

ECTFE and FEP are both polymer grades. ECTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP, about 138% more; tensile strength follows at 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, FEP is the more ductile: elongation 320% versus 250% for ECTFE, and ECTFE is harder (75 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). ECTFE is lighter (1.68 g/cm³ vs 2.15 g/cm³ for FEP) and ECTFE is stiffer (1.7 GPa vs 0.48 GPa). On the shop floor, ECTFE sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than FEP (specialty, $$$$$).

ECTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

FEPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ECTFE vs FEP: properties

ECTFEFEP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
0.48 GPa0.07 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
23 MPa3.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

31 MPa4.5 ksi
13 MPa1.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

250%
320%

Compressive Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in
2,700 J/m50.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
56 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

93 HRR
25 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.18 GPa0.03 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.68 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

240°C464 °F
260°C500 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

65°C149 °F
-90°C-130 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.447
1.344

Light Transmission

90%
95%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-76°C-105 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

116°C241 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

77°C171 °F
51°C124 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

145°C293 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
95%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
230°C446 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

80 kV/mm2,032 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
2.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
6×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

96 / 100
98 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
98 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
4%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
7 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

280°C536 °F
350°C662 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Weldability 80 / 100 · Formability (cold) 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
11 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

283 kJ/m³
176 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFEPECTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityECTFEFEP
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ECTFE vs FEP — frequently asked

Is ECTFE stronger than FEP?

Yes. ECTFE has a typical yield strength of 31 MPa (4.5 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP — about 138% more. Tensile strength is 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ECTFE or FEP?

ECTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while FEP is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose ECTFE over FEP?

Pick ECTFE when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint. Pick FEP when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ECTFE and FEP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.