FabDigitFabDigit

FEP vs PVC

Polymer · grade comparison

FEP and PVC are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. PVC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP, about 3.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, FEP is the more ductile: elongation 320% versus 45% for PVC, and PVC is harder (82 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). PVC is lighter (1.42 g/cm³ vs 2.15 g/cm³ for FEP) and PVC is stiffer (3 GPa vs 0.48 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC machines more easily (excellent vs good), PVC welds better (excellent vs very good), and PVC sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than FEP (specialty, $$$$$).

FEPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PVCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

FEP vs PVC: properties

FEPPVC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.48 GPa0.07 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.18 GPa0.03 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

23 MPa3.3 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
45%

Compressive Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

2,700 J/m50.6 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

56 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

25 HRR
110 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Shear Strength

—
41 MPa5.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

260°C500 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-90°C-130 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.06%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
0.2%

Refractive Index

1.344
1.54

Light Transmission

95%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F
950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
60°C140 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

51°C124 °F
68°C154 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
45%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

230°C446 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
80°C176 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.1
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

6×10⁻⁴
0.015

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

98 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
185°C365 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb
67 MJ/kg28,805 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
37 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

176 kJ/m³
417 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVCFEP

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFEPPVC
Default conditionUnfilledRigid (Type I)
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

FEP vs PVC — frequently asked

Is PVC stronger than FEP?

Yes. PVC has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP — about 3.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, FEP or PVC?

PVC is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while FEP is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, FEP or PVC?

PVC. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (55/100) for FEP; for welding the order is PVC first (excellent, 90/100) then FEP (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FEP and PVC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.