FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs EPS

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and EPS are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS, about 210 times as much; tensile strength follows at 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi). ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 3% for EPS. EPS is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 1.04 g/cm³ for ABS) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, EPS machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and ABS welds better (very good vs fair).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

ABS vs EPS: properties

ABSEPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.1

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
0.25 MPa0.04 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
0.2 MPa0.03 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
3%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
0.11 MPa0.02 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
0.26 MPa0.04 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
0 GPa6.53×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
0.11 MPa0.02 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.02 g/cm³7.23×10⁻⁴ lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
96°C205 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 75°C167 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
1.03

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
—

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
110°C230 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
13 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
4 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
1.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSEPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSEPS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs EPS — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than EPS?

Yes. ABS has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS — about 210 times as much. Tensile strength is 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or EPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or EPS?

EPS. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for ABS; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then EPS (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and EPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.