FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ZL110 vs ZL205A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ZL110 and ZL205A are both aluminum grades. ZL205A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for ZL110, about 106% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). ZL205A is the more ductile: elongation 9% versus 0.5% for ZL110, and ZL205A is harder (105 HB vs 92 HB). ZL110 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous) and ZL205A conducts heat better (150 W/m·K vs 120 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ZL205A machines more easily (very good vs good), ZL205A welds better (fair vs poor), and ZL110 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than ZL205A (high, $$$$).

ZL110Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ZL205AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ZL110 vs ZL205A: properties

ZL110ZL205A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
9%

Reduction in Area

1%
—

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

92 HB
105 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

54 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

97 HV
112 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

525°C977 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

600°C1,112 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

29 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.72 V
-0.73 V

Corrosion Resistance

38 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
150%

Weldability

22 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

75 kN·m/kg
163 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

167 kJ/m³
731 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.7 mm²/s
60.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
44

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZL205AZL110

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZL110ZL205A
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—T5
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

ZL110 vs ZL205A — frequently asked

Is ZL205A stronger than ZL110?

Yes. ZL205A has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for ZL110 — about 106% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ZL110 or ZL205A?

ZL110 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while ZL205A is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ZL110 or ZL205A?

ZL205A. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (62/100) for ZL110; for welding the order is ZL205A first (fair, 45/100) then ZL110 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ZL110 and ZL205A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.