FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ZL102 vs ZL110

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ZL102 and ZL110 are both aluminum grades. ZL110 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ZL102, about 94% more; tensile strength follows at 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi). In exchange, ZL102 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 0.5% for ZL110, and ZL110 is harder (92 HB vs 55 HB). ZL102 is lighter (2.65 g/cm³ vs 2.8 g/cm³ for ZL110) and ZL110 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, ZL110 machines more easily (good vs fair), ZL102 welds better (very good vs poor), and ZL102 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL110 (standard, $$).

ZL102Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ZL110Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ZL102 vs ZL110: properties

ZL102ZL110

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
0.5%

Shear Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
92 HB

Hardness, Vickers

60 HV
97 HV

Reduction in Area

—
1%

Compressive Strength

—
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
54 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 70 MPa10.2 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
525°C977 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

31 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.72 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
38 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
190%

Weldability

75 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

98 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11.5 kg CO₂/kg
9.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

64 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

45 kJ/m³
167 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

56.8 mm²/s
48.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZL102ZL110

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZL102ZL110
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionF—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

ZL102 vs ZL110 — frequently asked

Is ZL110 stronger than ZL102?

Yes. ZL110 has a typical yield strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ZL102 — about 94% more. Tensile strength is 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ZL102 or ZL110?

ZL102 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL110 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ZL102 or ZL110?

ZL110. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (45/100) for ZL102; for welding the order is ZL102 first (very good, 75/100) then ZL110 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ZL102 and ZL110 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.