FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ZL205A vs ZL301

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ZL205A and ZL301 are both aluminum grades. ZL205A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for ZL301, about 191% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi). ZL205A is the more ductile: elongation 9% versus 3% for ZL301, and ZL205A is harder (105 HB vs 55 HB). ZL301 is lighter (2.57 g/cm³ vs 2.82 g/cm³ for ZL205A) and ZL205A runs hotter in service (175°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, ZL301 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than ZL205A (high, $$$$).

ZL205AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ZL301Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ZL205A vs ZL301: properties

ZL205AZL301

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
25.5 GPa3.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
66 GPa9.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
3%

Compressive Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Shear Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Vickers

112 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.57 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

545°C1,013 °F
450°C842 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
25.2 µm/m·K14 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
380 J/g163 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
8.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.23 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.73 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

150%
300%

Castability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 45 / 100 · Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

10%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

163 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.8 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

731 kJ/m³
89 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

60.4 mm²/s
40.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZL205AZL301

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZL205AZL301
Default conditionT5F
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

ZL205A vs ZL301 — frequently asked

Is ZL205A stronger than ZL301?

Yes. ZL205A has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for ZL301 — about 191% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ZL205A or ZL301?

ZL301 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while ZL205A is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose ZL205A over ZL301?

Pick ZL205A when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick ZL301 when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ZL205A and ZL301 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.