FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ZL106 vs ZL205A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ZL106 and ZL205A are both aluminum grades. ZL205A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for ZL106, about 52% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). ZL205A is the more ductile: elongation 9% versus 1.5% for ZL106, and ZL205A is harder (105 HB vs 90 HB). ZL106 is lighter (2.73 g/cm³ vs 2.82 g/cm³ for ZL205A) and ZL106 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, ZL205A machines more easily (very good vs good) and ZL106 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than ZL205A (high, $$$$).

ZL106Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

ZL205AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ZL106 vs ZL205A: properties

ZL106ZL205A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
9%

Compressive Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
105 HB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
112 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

550°C1,022 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

610°C1,130 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.73 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
150%

Weldability

42 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

101 kN·m/kg
163 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

311 kJ/m³
731 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

53.3 mm²/s
60.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
44

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZL205AZL106

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZL106ZL205A
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—T5
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

ZL106 vs ZL205A — frequently asked

Is ZL205A stronger than ZL106?

Yes. ZL205A has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for ZL106 — about 52% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ZL106 or ZL205A?

ZL106 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while ZL205A is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ZL106 or ZL205A?

ZL205A. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (58/100) for ZL106.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ZL106 and ZL205A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.