FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ZL110 vs ZL301

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ZL110 and ZL301 are both aluminum grades. ZL110 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for ZL301, about 41% more; tensile strength follows at 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi). In exchange, ZL301 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 0.5% for ZL110, and ZL110 is harder (92 HB vs 55 HB). ZL301 is lighter (2.57 g/cm³ vs 2.8 g/cm³ for ZL110) and ZL110 is stiffer (72 GPa vs 68 GPa). On the shop floor, ZL301 machines more easily (very good vs good) and ZL301 welds better (fair vs poor).

ZL110Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ZL301Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ZL110 vs ZL301: properties

ZL110ZL301

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
25.5 GPa3.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
66 GPa9.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
3%

Reduction in Area

1%
—

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

92 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

54 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

97 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.57 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

525°C977 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 600°C1,112 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F
25.2 µm/m·K14 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
380 J/g163 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

29 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in
8.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.23 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.72 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

38 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
300%

Weldability

22 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
13.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

75 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

167 kJ/m³
89 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.7 mm²/s
40.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZL301ZL110

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZL110ZL301
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—F
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

ZL110 vs ZL301 — frequently asked

Is ZL110 stronger than ZL301?

Yes. ZL110 has a typical yield strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for ZL301 — about 41% more. Tensile strength is 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ZL110 or ZL301?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ZL110 or ZL301?

ZL301. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against good (62/100) for ZL110; for welding the order is ZL301 first (fair, 45/100) then ZL110 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ZL110 and ZL301 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.