FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ZL102 vs ZL205A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ZL102 and ZL205A are both aluminum grades. ZL205A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ZL102, about 4.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi). ZL205A is the more ductile: elongation 9% versus 5% for ZL102, and ZL205A is harder (105 HB vs 55 HB). ZL102 is lighter (2.65 g/cm³ vs 2.82 g/cm³ for ZL205A) and ZL205A runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, ZL205A machines more easily (very good vs fair), ZL102 welds better (very good vs fair), and ZL102 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL205A (high, $$$$).

ZL102Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

ZL205AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ZL102 vs ZL205A: properties

ZL102ZL205A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
9%

Shear Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
105 HB

Hardness, Vickers

60 HV
112 HV

Compressive Strength

—
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

31 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.73 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
150%

Weldability

75 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

98 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11.5 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

70%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

64 kN·m/kg
163 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

45 kJ/m³
731 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

56.8 mm²/s
60.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
44

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZL102ZL205A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZL102ZL205A
Default conditionFT5
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

ZL102 vs ZL205A — frequently asked

Is ZL205A stronger than ZL102?

Yes. ZL205A has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ZL102 — about 4.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ZL102 or ZL205A?

ZL102 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL205A is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ZL102 or ZL205A?

ZL205A. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (45/100) for ZL102; for welding the order is ZL102 first (very good, 75/100) then ZL205A (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ZL102 and ZL205A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.