FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 3003 vs 3005

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 3003 and 3005 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 3005 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 3003, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) vs 150 MPa (21.8 ksi). In exchange, 3003 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 5% for 3005, and 3005 is harder (48 HB vs 40 HB). 3003 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 3003 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100).

3003Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

3005Choose it when strength drives the design.

3003 vs 3005: properties

30033005

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

25 GPa3.6 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

145 MPa21 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
5%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

40 HB
48 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

643°C1,189 °F
630°C1,166 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Same in both: Density 2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F
23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 893 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 41 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.84 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
30%

Same in both: Formability (cold) 70 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
64 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

153 kJ/m³
174 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

65.2 mm²/s
66.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale30033005

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30033005
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
DLCYes—

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

3003 vs 3005 — frequently asked

Is 3005 stronger than 3003?

Yes. 3005 has a typical yield strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 3003 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) vs 150 MPa (21.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 3003 or 3005?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 3003 or 3005?

3003, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 3005; for welding the order is 3003 first (excellent, 90/100) then 3005 (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 3003 and 3005 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.