FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 3005 vs 3104

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 3005 and 3104 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 3104 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for 3005, about 77% more; tensile strength follows at 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) vs 175 MPa (25.4 ksi). In exchange, 3005 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for 3104, and 3104 is harder (82 HB vs 48 HB). 3005 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 100°C continuous).

3005Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

3104Choose it when strength drives the design.

3005 vs 3104: properties

30053104

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
3%

Shear Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

48 HB
82 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
90 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
629°C1,164 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
162 W/m·K93.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
396 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 893 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 41 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 35 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Weldability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

64 kN·m/kg
108 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

174 kJ/m³
548 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

66.9 mm²/s
66.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
30

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale30053104

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30053104
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Sheet metal. Both take the same 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

3005 vs 3104 — frequently asked

Is 3104 stronger than 3005?

Yes. 3104 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for 3005 — about 77% more. Tensile strength is 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) vs 175 MPa (25.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 3005 or 3104?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 3005 over 3104?

Pick 3005 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat. Pick 3104 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 3005 and 3104 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.