FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 3004 vs 3005

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 3004 and 3005 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 3004 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for 3005, about 29% more; tensile strength follows at 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 175 MPa (25.4 ksi). 3004 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 5% for 3005, and 3004 is harder (63 HB vs 48 HB). 3004 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 3004 machines more easily (50 vs 35 out of 100).

3004Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

3004 vs 3005: properties

30043005

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
5%

Compressive Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

63 HB
48 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

629°C1,164 °F
630°C1,166 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

162 W/m·K93.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F
23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 893 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

42 % IACS
41 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in
4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.84 V · Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
30%

Weldability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

55%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

88 kN·m/kg
64 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

290 kJ/m³
174 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

66.7 mm²/s
66.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale30043005

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30043005
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Sheet metal. Both take the same 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

3004 vs 3005 — frequently asked

Is 3004 stronger than 3005?

Yes. 3004 has a typical yield strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for 3005 — about 29% more. Tensile strength is 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 175 MPa (25.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 3004 or 3005?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 3004 or 3005?

3004, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 35/100 for 3005.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 3004 and 3005 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.