FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1100 vs 3003

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1100 and 3003 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 3003 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 145 MPa (21 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for 1100, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) vs 125 MPa (18.1 ksi). In exchange, 1100 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for 3003, and 3003 is harder (40 HB vs 32 HB). 3003 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 1100 conducts heat better (222 W/m·K vs 159 W/m·K).

1100Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

3003Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Buyer's decision notes

Choose 1100 when high aluminum content, conductivity, chemical handling or very demanding forming drives the design. Choose 3003 for general sheet-metal work that needs more strength while retaining good forming and joining behavior.

Compare the same condition

These base-grade routes do not name a temper. Compare the same product form, gauge and temper—such as annealed sheet against annealed sheet—because cold-worked H tempers can change strength and bend behavior more than the alloy name suggests.

Function before strength
Start with the reason for choosing commercially pure 1100: conductivity, chemical compatibility, reflectivity or deep-forming behavior. If none is design-critical, 3003 often provides a more useful general fabrication margin.
Forming route
Specify draw depth, bend radius, grain direction and intermediate annealing rather than relying on “soft aluminum.” The selected temper must match the forming sequence and the final stiffness needed to resist handling damage.
Machining and threads
Both can produce soft chips and burrs. For precision machined features, review tool geometry, workholding, thread engagement and whether a harder alloy or inserted thread gives a more stable production route.
Appearance
Mill finish, bright finish, brush direction and anodize appearance are purchasing variables. Control incoming surface and cosmetic side before forming because tooling marks and orange peel can dominate the final part.

Put this on the RFQ

  • Name alloy, exact temper, sheet or plate specification, gauge tolerance, surface finish and cosmetic side.
  • Provide draw depth, bend direction, minimum inside radii, flatness needs and whether annealing is allowed between operations.
  • State conductivity or chemical-service requirements explicitly and identify the test or certification needed for acceptance.

Primary references

  • Hydro — 1100 aluminum — Producer overview of 1100 composition, forming, joining and common high-purity applications.
  • Hydro — 3003 aluminum — Producer overview of 3003 for general sheet-metal, spinning and forming applications requiring moderate strength.
  • ASTM — B209/B209M — Current specification for aluminum sheet and plate by alloy, temper, finish and product form.

FabDigit resources: 1100 datasheet, 3003 datasheet, CNC design guide and sheet-metal design guide.

1100 vs 3003: properties

11003003

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
68.9 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
10%

Shear Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
96 MPa13.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

48 MPa7 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

32 HB
40 HB

Hardness, Vickers

35 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 643°C1,189 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

222 W/m·K128 BTU/hr·ft·°F
159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
893 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-273°C-459 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

57 % IACS
41 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in
4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
—

Weldability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

96 kJ/m³
153 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

90.6 mm²/s
65.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale11003003

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability11003003
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

1100 vs 3003 — frequently asked

Is 3003 stronger than 1100?

Yes. 3003 has a typical yield strength of 145 MPa (21 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for 1100 — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) vs 125 MPa (18.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1100 or 3003?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1100 or 3003?

3003, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 1100; for welding the order is 1100 first (excellent, 95/100) then 3003 (excellent, 90/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1100 and 3003 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.