FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy IN-738LC-FHT

Heat-treated state · default condition

UNS N07738

FHT = full heat treatment: 1120 °C/2 h/AC + 843 °C/24 h/AC

Standard supplied condition for conventionally cast turbine blades and vanes — best balance of γ′ strengthening and creep life.

High cost $$$$

Values for the FHT condition

Other IN-738LC tempers and conditions

IN-738LC is listed in 4 conditions; see the grade overview at IN-738LC.

Compare all 4 conditionsHide
Condition · open for datasheetBest forYield MPaTensile MPaElong. %HardnessConductivity
Spheroidize annealed
Raw investment casting before solution/age; used only as an intermediate state or for non-critical hardware.760830432 HRC1.3 % IACS
Directionally solidified casting, solution + aged
Columnar-grain version for higher thermal-fatigue and creep capability along the blade stacking axis.8801,0001035 HRC1.3 % IACS
FHTDefaultThis page
Full heat treatment: 1120 °C/2 h/AC + 843 °C/24 h/AC
Standard supplied condition for conventionally cast turbine blades and vanes — best balance of γ′ strengthening and creep life.9451,030636 HRC1.3 % IACS
hot isostatic pressed (~1200 °C / 100–170 MPa / 4 h) then solution + age
Choose when casting microporosity must be closed for maximum LCF/creep life on high-duty rotating blades.9601,090836 HRC1.3 % IACS

What is IN-738LC-FHT?

IN-738LC-FHT is IN-738LC heat treated to FHT — standard supplied condition for conventionally cast turbine blades and vanes — best balance of γ′ strengthening and creep life. IN-738LC-FHT has a yield strength of 945 MPa (137 ksi) and a tensile strength of 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) — stronger than 94% of nickel alloy grades. Elongation at break is 6% and the elastic modulus is 201 GPa (29.2 Msi). IN-738LC-FHT has a density of 8.11 g/cm³ (0.293 lb/in³), lighter than 77% of nickel alloy grades. It melts at 1,230°C (2,246 °F).

Advantages

  • High strength — 945 MPa (137 ksi), better than 94% of nickel alloy grades

Limitations

  • Limited formability — 3/100, worse than 97% of nickel alloy grades
  • Limited ductility — 6%, worse than 90% of nickel alloy grades
  • Difficult to weld — 15/100, worse than 87% of nickel alloy grades
  • High embodied carbon — 15 kg CO₂/kg, worse than 87% of nickel alloy grades
  • Hard to polish — 60/100, worse than 84% of nickel alloy grades

IN-738LC-FHT properties

Typical room-temperature values for IN-738LC-FHT; 22 are specific to this condition. Other listed values are IN-738LC reference data and may not represent this condition. Bars are the position among nickel alloy grades.

Physical3

IN-738LC-FHT has a density of 8.11 g/cm³ (0.293 lb/in³), lighter than 77% of nickel alloy grades. It melts at 1,230°C (2,246 °F).

Density8.11 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
Melting Point (Solidus)1,230°C2,246 °F
Liquidus Temperature1,315°C2,399 °F

Mechanical16

IN-738LC-FHT has a yield strength of 945 MPa (137 ksi) and a tensile strength of 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) — stronger than 94% of nickel alloy grades. Elongation at break is 6% and the elastic modulus is 201 GPa (29.2 Msi).

Elastic (Young's) Modulus201 GPa29.2 Msi
Shear Modulus78 GPa11.3 Msi
Bulk Modulus168 GPa24.4 Msi
Poisson's Ratio0.29
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)1,030 MPa149 ksi
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)945 MPa137 ksi
Elongation at Break6%
Reduction in Area8%
Compressive Strength1,000 MPa145 ksi
Shear Strength670 MPa97.2 ksi
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)400 MPa58 ksi
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)12 J8.9 ft·lbf
Hardness, Brinell331 HB
Hardness, Rockwell C36 HRC
Hardness, Vickers350 HV

Thermal6

IN-738LC-FHT is rated for continuous service to 980°C (1,796 °F). It conducts heat at 11 W/m·K (6.36 BTU/hr·ft·°F), worse than 60% of nickel alloy grades. Thermal expansion is 11.6 µm/m·K (6.44 µin/in·°F).

Thermal Conductivity11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
Specific Heat Capacity430 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
Latent Heat of Fusion290 J/g125 BTU/lb
Max Service Temperature (continuous)980°C1,796 °F
Min Service Temperature-196°C-321 °F

Electrical3

IN-738LC-FHT conducts electricity at 1.3 % IACS, worse than 89% of nickel alloy grades.

Electrical Conductivity1.3 % IACS
Electrical Resistivity1.3×10⁻⁶ Ω·m51.2 µΩ·in
Magnetic Responsenon-magnetic

Chemical & Environmental3

Corrosion resistance is excellent (85/100), better than 74% of nickel alloy grades.

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)-0.15 V
Corrosion ResistanceExcellent85/100
Chemical Resistance SummaryExcellent resistance to sulphidation and Na₂SO₄/V-bearing combustion-gas hot corrosion up to ~900 °C and to oxidation to ~980 °C; attacked by molten chlorides and strong reducing halide atmospheres; not intended for aqueous acid service.

Sustainability4

Producing a kilogram of IN-738LC-FHT takes about 215 MJ of energy and emits 15 kg of CO₂ — more than 84% of nickel alloy grades. Typical recycled content is 30%.

Embodied Energy (primary production)215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
Embodied Carbon (primary production)15 kg CO₂/kg
Embodied Water300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
Typical Recycled Content30%

Manufacturability8

IN-738LC-FHT's machinability is not recommended (12/100, worse than 86% of nickel alloy grades); weldability poor (15/100); formability not recommended (3/100).

MachinabilityNot recommended12/100
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)8%
WeldabilityPoor15/100
Formability (cold)Not recommended3/100
CastabilityVery good72/100
Brazeability / SolderabilityGood55/100
PolishabilityGood60/100
Anodizing Responsen/a — not anodized; protected instead by aluminide or MCrAlY diffusion/overlay coatings and TBC

Common Calculations5

Specific Strength (UTS / density)calculated127 kN·m/kg
Specific Stiffness (E / density)calculated24.8 MN·m/kg
Modulus of Resiliencecalculated2,221 kJ/m³
Thermal Diffusivitycalculated3.2 mm²/s
Thermal Shock Resistance Indexcalculated5

Values are nominal handbook figures for design screening. Confirm any required mill or lot documentation when quoting.

Working with IN-738LC-FHT

Is IN-738LC easy to machine?

Very difficult: rigid setups, ceramic or coated-carbide tools, low speeds with high feed, flood coolant; grinding, EDM and ECM are standard for cooling holes and root forms.

Can IN-738LC be welded?

Highly crack-sensitive (γ′ >40 %): weld in solutioned/over-aged condition, use preheat or hot-box GTAW/laser cladding with ductile Ni fillers, followed by full solution + age; wide-gap brazing is the preferred repair route.

Can IN-738LC be formed, bent or molded?

Investment casting only (equiaxed, DS or LPBF); no cold forming — control shell temperature and gating to avoid hot tearing and shrinkage porosity, HIP to close residual porosity.

What surface finishes work on IN-738LC?

Grit blast and chemical clean, then aluminide diffusion or MCrAlY overlay coating plus optional YSZ thermal-barrier coat; polish or vibro-finish airfoils before coating.

IN-738LC chemical composition (wt %)

Limits by weight percent from the governing specification, written the way the spec states them — a single maximum for impurities, a range for alloying elements, and the base element as balance. Nominal is the typical mid-range value.

ElementSpec limit (wt %)Nominal
Clow-carbon variant of IN-7380.09 – 0.130.11
Crhot-corrosion resistance15.7 – 16.316
Co8 – 98.5
Mo1.5 – 21.75
W2.4 – 2.82.6
Ta1.5 – 21.75
Nb0.6 – 1.10.9
Alγ′ former3.2 – 3.73.4
Tiγ′ former3.2 – 3.73.4
B0.010.01
Zr0.03 – 0.080.05
Fe≤ 0.5—
Si≤ 0.3—
Mn≤ 0.2—
S≤ 0.02—
Nibalance, ~61 %balance—

IN-738LC-FHT — frequently asked

What is IN-738LC-FHT used for?

IN-738LC-FHT is typically used for industrial gas turbine blades, vanes and hot corrosion-resistant hot-section parts. In short: benchmark IGT blade alloy; strong hot corrosion resistance; castings only, weld-sensitive.

What is the yield strength of IN-738LC-FHT?

IN-738LC-FHT has a typical yield strength of 945 MPa (137 ksi) and a tensile strength of 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) — stronger than 94% of nickel alloy grades. Strength varies by condition: see the 4 listed tempers.

Is IN-738LC-FHT easy to machine?

Not especially — machinability is rated not recommended (12/100, worse than 86% of nickel alloy grades). Very difficult: rigid setups, ceramic or coated-carbide tools, low speeds with high feed, flood coolant; grinding, EDM and ECM are standard for cooling holes and root forms.

Can IN-738LC-FHT be welded?

Not readily — weldability is rated poor (15/100). Highly crack-sensitive (γ′ >40 %): weld in solutioned/over-aged condition, use preheat or hot-box GTAW/laser cladding with ductile Ni fillers, followed by full solution + age; wide-gap brazing is the preferred repair route.

What surface finishes work on IN-738LC-FHT?

Grit blast and chemical clean, then aluminide diffusion or MCrAlY overlay coating plus optional YSZ thermal-barrier coat; polish or vibro-finish airfoils before coating.

Can IN-738LC-FHT be formed, bent or molded?

Investment casting only (equiaxed, DS or LPBF); no cold forming — control shell temperature and gating to avoid hot tearing and shrinkage porosity, HIP to close residual porosity.

What is the maximum service temperature of IN-738LC-FHT?

IN-738LC-FHT is rated for continuous use to about 980°C (1,796 °F). Strength falls off well before that limit — check the elevated-temperature data for load-bearing parts.

What is the difference between IN-738LC-FHT and IN-738LC-AC?

FHT is the default condition — standard supplied condition for conventionally cast turbine blades and vanes — best balance of γ′ strengthening and creep life. AC: raw investment casting before solution/age; used only as an intermediate state or for non-critical hardware. Yield strength is 945 MPa in FHT versus 760 MPa in AC.

Sources

  1. IN-738 Alloy Technical Data (Inco/Special Metals) — International Nickel Co. / Special Metals (1981)
  2. ASM Handbook Vol.1 — Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels and High-Performance Alloys — ASM International (1990)
  3. Superalloys II — High-Temperature Materials for Aerospace and Industrial Power — Wiley (1987)
  4. UNS N07738 alloy designation (Metals & Alloys in the Unified Numbering System) — SAE/ASTM (2017)
  5. Cast Ni-base superalloy property compilations (thermophysical and mechanical data) — NIMS / open literature (2020)

Property data is compiled from published supplier and standards handbooks and normalised for comparison. Nothing on this page is a certification — request mill certs, CoC or material test reports with your order.