FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A372 Grade D vs P265GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A372 Grade D and P265GH are both steel grades. A372 Grade D is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH, about 86% more; tensile strength follows at 725 MPa (105 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi). In exchange, P265GH is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 18% for A372 Grade D, and A372 Grade D is harder (215 HB vs 140 HB). On the shop floor, P265GH machines more easily (good vs fair) and P265GH welds better (excellent vs fair).

A372 Grade DChoose it when strength drives the design.

P265GHChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A372 Grade D vs P265GH: properties

A372 Grade DP265GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
211 GPa30.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

725 MPa105 ksi
465 MPa67.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
26%

Reduction in Area

45%
52%

Compressive Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Shear Strength

435 MPa63.1 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

325 MPa47.1 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
76 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

20 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

225 HV
147 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-10°C14 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.62 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
66 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
63%

Weldability

40 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
76 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

738 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
13.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP265GHA372 Grade D

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA372 Grade DP265GH
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A372 Grade D vs P265GH — frequently asked

Is A372 Grade D stronger than P265GH?

Yes. A372 Grade D has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH — about 86% more. Tensile strength is 725 MPa (105 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A372 Grade D or P265GH?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A372 Grade D or P265GH?

P265GH. Its machinability rates good (66/100) against fair (50/100) for A372 Grade D; for welding the order is P265GH first (excellent, 90/100) then A372 Grade D (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A372 Grade D and P265GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.