FabDigitFabDigit

Steel P265GH vs P92

Steel · grade comparison

Steel P265GH and P92 are both steel grades, both pressure vessel steel. P92 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH, about 110% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi). In exchange, P265GH is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 17% for P92, and P92 is harder (280 HB vs 140 HB). P265GH conducts heat better (50 W/m·K vs 27 W/m·K). On the shop floor, P265GH machines more easily (good vs poor) and P265GH welds better (excellent vs poor).

P265GHChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

P92Choose it when strength drives the design.

P265GH vs P92: properties

P265GHP92

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

211 GPa30.6 Msi
216 GPa31.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
84 GPa12.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

465 MPa67.4 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
17%

Reduction in Area

52%
50%

Compressive Strength

295 MPa42.8 ksi
630 MPa91.4 ksi

Shear Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

140 HB
280 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

76 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

147 HV
295 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
29 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.78 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,520°C2,768 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
27 W/m·K15.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-10°C14 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
2.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m24.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
28 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

66 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

63%
32%

Weldability

90 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

76 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
27.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

206 kJ/m³
890 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.8 mm²/s
7.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP265GHP92

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityP265GHP92
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

P265GH vs P92 — frequently asked

Is P92 stronger than P265GH?

Yes. P92 has a typical yield strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH — about 110% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, P265GH or P92?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, P265GH or P92?

P265GH. Its machinability rates good (66/100) against poor (28/100) for P92; for welding the order is P265GH first (excellent, 90/100) then P92 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in P265GH and P92 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.