FabDigitFabDigit

Steel P265GH vs P355GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel P265GH and P355GH are both steel grades, both pressure vessel steel. P355GH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH, about 31% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi). P355GH is harder — 165 HB against 140 HB for P265GH — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. P265GH conducts electricity better (10 % IACS vs 8.2 % IACS). On the shop floor, P265GH forms better (very good vs good).

P355GHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

P265GH vs P355GH: properties

P265GHP355GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

211 GPa30.6 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

465 MPa67.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
24%

Reduction in Area

52%
50%

Compressive Strength

295 MPa42.8 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Shear Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

140 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

76 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

147 HV
173 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 81 GPa11.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,460°C2,660 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,520°C2,768 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
380°C716 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -10°C14 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
8.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in
2.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.27 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.62 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

66 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

63%
62%

Weldability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

76 / 100
64 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

206 kJ/m³
353 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.8 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP265GHP355GH

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityP265GHP355GH
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

P265GH vs P355GH — frequently asked

Is P355GH stronger than P265GH?

Yes. P355GH has a typical yield strength of 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH — about 31% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, P265GH or P355GH?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, P265GH or P355GH?

P265GH, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 66/100 against 58/100 for P355GH; for welding the order is P265GH first (excellent, 90/100) then P355GH (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in P265GH and P355GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.