FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A285 vs P265GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A285 and P265GH are both steel grades, both pressure vessel steel. P265GH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for A285, about 18% more. In exchange, A285 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 26% for P265GH, and P265GH is harder (140 HB vs 130 HB). P265GH is stiffer (211 GPa vs 200 GPa).

A285Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

P265GHChoose it when strength drives the design.

A285 vs P265GH: properties

A285P265GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
211 GPa30.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
465 MPa67.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
26%

Reduction in Area

55%
52%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
76 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
147 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,460°C2,660 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,515°C2,759 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-10°C14 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.8 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
12 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.62 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
66 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
63%

Weldability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
76 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

30 L/kg3.6 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

156 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 13.8 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP265GHA285

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA285P265GH
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

A285 vs P265GH — frequently asked

Is P265GH stronger than A285?

Yes. P265GH has a typical yield strength of 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for A285 — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 465 MPa (67.4 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A285 or P265GH?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose A285 over P265GH?

Pick A285 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick P265GH when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A285 and P265GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.