FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A372 Grade B vs P265GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A372 Grade B and P265GH are both steel grades. A372 Grade B is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH, about 59% more; tensile strength follows at 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi). In exchange, P265GH is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 22% for A372 Grade B, and A372 Grade B is harder (197 HB vs 140 HB). On the shop floor, P265GH machines more easily (66 vs 55 out of 100), P265GH welds better (excellent vs good), and A372 Grade B sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than P265GH (standard, $$).

A372 Grade BChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

P265GHChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

A372 Grade B vs P265GH: properties

A372 Grade BP265GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
211 GPa30.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

655 MPa95 ksi
465 MPa67.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
26%

Reduction in Area

50%
52%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Shear Strength

385 MPa55.8 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

48 J35.4 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

197 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
76 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

207 HV
147 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-10°C14 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 10 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
66 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
63%

Weldability

55 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
76 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

83 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

539 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13 mm²/s
13.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP265GHA372 Grade B

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA372 Grade BP265GH
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A372 Grade B vs P265GH — frequently asked

Is A372 Grade B stronger than P265GH?

Yes. A372 Grade B has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) for P265GH — about 59% more. Tensile strength is 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 465 MPa (67.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A372 Grade B or P265GH?

A372 Grade B is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while P265GH is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A372 Grade B or P265GH?

P265GH, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 66/100 against 55/100 for A372 Grade B; for welding the order is P265GH first (excellent, 90/100) then A372 Grade B (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A372 Grade B and P265GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.