FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A210 vs P265GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A210 and P265GH are both steel grades. Both yield at about 300 MPa — strength does not separate them. A210 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 26% for P265GH, and P265GH is harder (140 HB vs 130 HB). On the shop floor, A210 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than P265GH (standard, $$).

A210Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A210 vs P265GH: properties

A210P265GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
211 GPa30.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
465 MPa67.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
26%

Reduction in Area

58%
52%

Compressive Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Shear Strength

285 MPa41.3 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
76 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

137 HV
147 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-10°C14 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 10 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.62 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
66 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
63%

Weldability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
76 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

29 MJ/kg12,468 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

220 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
13.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP265GHA210

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA210P265GH
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A210 vs P265GH — frequently asked

What is the difference between A210 and P265GH?

Steel A210 and P265GH are both steel grades. Both yield at about 300 MPa — strength does not separate them. A210 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 26% for P265GH, and P265GH is harder (140 HB vs 130 HB).

Which is cheaper, A210 or P265GH?

A210 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while P265GH is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, A210 or P265GH?

P265GH. Its weldability rates excellent (90/100) against excellent (85/100) for A210.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A210 and P265GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.