FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 20G vs P265GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 20G and P265GH are both steel grades. P265GH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 20G, about 7% more. 20G runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, 20G sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than P265GH (standard, $$).

20GChoose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

P265GHChoose it when strength drives the design.

20G vs P265GH: properties

20GP265GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
211 GPa30.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
465 MPa67.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
26%

Reduction in Area

58%
52%

Compressive Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
295 MPa42.8 ksi

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

135 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

74 HRB
76 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

142 HV
147 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 81 GPa11.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.1 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-10°C14 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
66 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
63%

Weldability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
76 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

180 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13 mm²/s
13.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP265GH20G

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20GP265GH
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

20G vs P265GH — frequently asked

Is P265GH stronger than 20G?

Yes. P265GH has a typical yield strength of 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 20G — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 465 MPa (67.4 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 20G or P265GH?

20G is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while P265GH is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 20G over P265GH?

Pick 20G when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick P265GH when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 20G and P265GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.