FabDigitFabDigit

PPSU vs PSU

Polymer · grade comparison

PPSU and PSU are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. Both yield at about 70 MPa — strength does not separate them. PPSU is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 60% for PSU. PSU is lighter (1.24 g/cm³ vs 1.29 g/cm³ for PPSU) and PSU is stiffer (2.5 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, PPSU welds better (very good vs good) and PSU sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PPSU (specialty, $$$$$).

PPSUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PSUChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PPSU vs PSU: properties

PPSUPSU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.34 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
71 MPa10.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

80%
60%

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

91 MPa13.2 ksi
106 MPa15.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

640 J/m12 ft·lbf/in
69 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

87 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

86 HRM
69 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

122 HRR
120 HRR

Same in both: Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 70 MPa10.2 ksi · Compressive Strength 96 MPa13.9 ksi · Shear Strength 60 MPa8.7 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.29 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

220°C428 °F
185°C365 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.37%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.1%
0.7%

Refractive Index

1.67
1.633

Light Transmission

—
75%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F
1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F
56 µm/m·K31.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

214°C417 °F
181°C358 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

207°C405 °F
174°C345 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

220°C428 °F
187°C369 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

38%
30%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

220°C428 °F
180°C356 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

15 kV/mm381 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.45
3.03

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0076
0.005

Volume Resistivity

9×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.65%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
6.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

375°C707 °F
355°C671 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

150°C302 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8.5 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.8 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,047 kJ/m³
980 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPSUPSU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPPSUPSU
Default conditionMedical GradeMedical Grade
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PPSU vs PSU — frequently asked

What is the difference between PPSU and PSU?

PPSU and PSU are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. Both yield at about 70 MPa — strength does not separate them. PPSU is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 60% for PSU.

Which is cheaper, PPSU or PSU?

PSU is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PPSU is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PPSU or PSU?

PPSU. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for PSU.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PPSU and PSU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.