FabDigitFabDigit

PAI vs PPSU

Polymer · grade comparison

PAI and PPSU are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PAI is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 152 MPa (22 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU, about 117% more. In exchange, PPSU is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 15% for PAI. PPSU is lighter (1.29 g/cm³ vs 1.42 g/cm³ for PAI) and PAI is stiffer (4.5 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, PPSU welds better (very good vs not recommended).

PAIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PPSUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PAI vs PPSU: properties

PAIPPSU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

4.5 GPa0.65 Msi
2.3 GPa0.34 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

152 MPa22 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
80%

Compressive Strength

166 MPa24.1 ksi
96 MPa13.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

244 MPa35.4 ksi
91 MPa13.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.8 GPa0.7 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

128 MPa18.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

137 J/m2.6 ft·lbf/in
640 J/m12 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

110 HRM
86 HRM

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
122 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.29 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

275°C527 °F
220°C428 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.28%
0.37%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

5%
1.1%

Refractive Index

—
1.67

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

31 µm/m·K17.2 µin/in·°F
55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

282°C540 °F
214°C417 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

278°C532 °F
207°C405 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
38%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

280°C536 °F
220°C428 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
220°C428 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.9
3.45

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.0076

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
9×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

200 V
150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.7%
0.6%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
150°C302 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3.2 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPSUPAI

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPAIPPSU
Default conditionUnfilled (Electrical)Medical Grade
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PAI vs PPSU — frequently asked

Is PAI stronger than PPSU?

Yes. PAI has a typical tensile strength of 152 MPa (22 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU — about 117% more.

Which is cheaper, PAI or PPSU?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PAI or PPSU?

PPSU. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against not recommended (10/100) for PAI.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PAI and PPSU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.