FabDigitFabDigit

PEKK vs PSU

Polymer · grade comparison

PEKK and PSU are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PEKK is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PSU, about 36% more; tensile strength follows at 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) vs 71 MPa (10.3 ksi). In exchange, PSU is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 8% for PEKK. PSU is lighter (1.24 g/cm³ vs 1.3 g/cm³ for PEKK) and PEKK is stiffer (3.9 GPa vs 2.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PSU sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PEKK (specialty, $$$$$).

PEKKChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PSUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEKK vs PSU: properties

PEKKPSU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.9 GPa0.57 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

7 GPa0.94 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
71 MPa10.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
60%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
96 MPa13.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
106 MPa15.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.9 GPa0.57 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Shear Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in
69 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
69 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

332°C630 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

162°C324 °F
185°C365 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
0.7%

Refractive Index

—
1.633

Light Transmission

—
75%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

48 µm/m·K26.7 µin/in·°F
56 µm/m·K31.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

240°C464 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

175°C347 °F
181°C358 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

160°C320 °F
174°C345 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

40%
30%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
180°C356 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
187°C369 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3.03

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.005

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

175 V
150 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.65%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
355°C671 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
140°C284 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
6.5 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

330 MJ/kg141,875 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,157 kJ/m³
980 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEKKPSU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEKKPSU
3D printingYes—
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledMedical Grade
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, UV Coating.

PEKK vs PSU — frequently asked

Is PEKK stronger than PSU?

Yes. PEKK has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PSU — about 36% more. Tensile strength is 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) vs 71 MPa (10.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEKK or PSU?

PSU is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PEKK is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PEKK or PSU?

PSU, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PEKK; for welding the order is PSU first (good, 60/100) then PEKK (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEKK and PSU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.