FabDigitFabDigit

PEKK vs PPSU

Polymer · grade comparison

PEKK and PPSU are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PEKK is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU, about 36% more; tensile strength follows at 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi). In exchange, PPSU is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 8% for PEKK. PEKK is stiffer (3.9 GPa vs 2.3 GPa) and PEKK runs hotter in service (240°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, PPSU welds better (very good vs good).

PEKKChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PPSUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PEKK vs PPSU: properties

PEKKPPSU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.9 GPa0.57 Msi
2.3 GPa0.34 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

7 GPa0.94 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
80%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
96 MPa13.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
91 MPa13.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.9 GPa0.57 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in
640 J/m12 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
86 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
122 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.29 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

332°C630 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

162°C324 °F
220°C428 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.37%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
1.1%

Refractive Index

—
1.67

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

48 µm/m·K26.7 µin/in·°F
55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

240°C464 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

175°C347 °F
214°C417 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

160°C320 °F
207°C405 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

40%
38%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
220°C428 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
220°C428 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3.45

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.0076

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
9×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

175 V
150 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.6%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

330 MJ/kg141,875 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,157 kJ/m³
1,047 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEKKPPSU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEKKPPSU
3D printingYes—
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledMedical Grade
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, UV Coating.

PEKK vs PPSU — frequently asked

Is PEKK stronger than PPSU?

Yes. PEKK has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU — about 36% more. Tensile strength is 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEKK or PPSU?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PEKK or PPSU?

PPSU. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for PEKK.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEKK and PPSU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.