FabDigitFabDigit

PPS vs PPSU

Polymer · grade comparison

PPS and PPSU are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PPS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi). In exchange, PPSU is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 5% for PPS. PPSU is lighter (1.29 g/cm³ vs 1.35 g/cm³ for PPS) and PPS is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, PPSU welds better (very good vs poor).

PPSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PPSUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PPS vs PPSU: properties

PPSPPSU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
2.3 GPa0.34 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

78 MPa11.3 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
80%

Compressive Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
96 MPa13.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
91 MPa13.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.9 GPa0.57 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in
640 J/m12 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

95 HRM
86 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

123 HRR
122 HRR

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.29 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

280°C536 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

88°C190 °F
220°C428 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.03%
0.37%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.1%
1.1%

Refractive Index

—
1.67

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F
55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

220°C428 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

240°C464 °F
214°C417 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

110°C230 °F
207°C405 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

47%
38%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

260°C500 °F
220°C428 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
220°C428 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
3.45

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0013
0.0076

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
9×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

175 V
150 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

30 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.6%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

320°C608 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

140°C284 °F
150°C302 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.2 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

58 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.8 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

740 kJ/m³
1,047 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPSPPSU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPPSPPSU
Default conditionUnfilledMedical Grade
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PPS vs PPSU — frequently asked

Is PPS stronger than PPSU?

Yes. PPS has a typical yield strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PPS or PPSU?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PPS or PPSU?

PPSU. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against poor (30/100) for PPS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PPS and PPSU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.