FabDigitFabDigit

PDLLA vs PHBH

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLLA and PHBH are both polymer grades. PDLLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PHBH, about 167% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, PHBH is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 5% for PDLLA, and PDLLA is harder (82 Shore D vs 58 Shore D). PHBH is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.25 g/cm³ for PDLLA) and PDLLA is stiffer (3 GPa vs 0.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PDLLA machines more easily (good vs fair), PHBH welds better (very good vs good), and PHBH sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLLA (high, $$$$).

PDLLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PHBHChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PDLLA vs PHBH: properties

PDLLAPHBH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
23 MPa3.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
150%

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
58 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
90 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
1°C34 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1%

Refractive Index

1.46
—

Light Transmission

90%
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
140°C284 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

45°C113 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

55°C131 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

57°C135 °F
95°C203 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

60°C140 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.013
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.5%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
160°C320 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
50°C122 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
19 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.4 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
203 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLLAPHBH

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLLAPHBH
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLLA vs PHBH — frequently asked

Is PDLLA stronger than PHBH?

Yes. PDLLA has a typical yield strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PHBH — about 167% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLLA or PHBH?

PHBH is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLLA or PHBH?

PDLLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (45/100) for PHBH; for welding the order is PHBH first (very good, 70/100) then PDLLA (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLLA and PHBH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.