FabDigitFabDigit

PDLA vs PHBH

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLA and PHBH are both polymer grades. PDLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PHBH, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, PHBH is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 4% for PDLA, and PDLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 58 Shore D). PHBH is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.25 g/cm³ for PDLA) and PDLA is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 0.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PDLA machines more easily (good vs fair), PHBH welds better (very good vs good), and PHBH sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLA (high, $$$$).

PDLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PHBHChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PDLA vs PHBH: properties

PDLAPHBH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.57 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
23 MPa3.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
150%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

83 Shore D
58 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
90 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

178°C352 °F
140°C284 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
1°C34 °F

Refractive Index

1.455
—

Light Transmission

90%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,590 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

50°C122 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

53°C127 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

59°C138 °F
95°C203 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.5%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
160°C320 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
50°C122 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
19 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

510 kJ/m³
203 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLAPHBH

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLAPHBH
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLA vs PHBH — frequently asked

Is PDLA stronger than PHBH?

Yes. PDLA has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PHBH — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLA or PHBH?

PHBH is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLA or PHBH?

PDLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (45/100) for PHBH; for welding the order is PHBH first (very good, 70/100) then PDLA (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLA and PHBH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.