FabDigitFabDigit

PEKK vs PPS

Polymer · grade comparison

PEKK and PPS are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PEKK is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for PPS, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) vs 78 MPa (11.3 ksi). PEKK is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 5% for PPS. PEKK is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.35 g/cm³ for PPS) and PEKK runs hotter in service (240°C vs 220°C continuous). On the shop floor, PEKK welds better (good vs poor).

PEKKChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PEKK vs PPS: properties

PEKKPPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.9 GPa0.57 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Bulk Modulus

7 GPa0.94 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
5%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
95 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
123 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.4 GPa0.2 Msi · Compressive Modulus 3.5 GPa0.51 Msi · Flexural Modulus 3.9 GPa0.57 Msi · Shear Strength 65 MPa9.4 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

332°C630 °F
280°C536 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

162°C324 °F
88°C190 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.03%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
0.1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

48 µm/m·K26.7 µin/in·°F
52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

240°C464 °F
220°C428 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

175°C347 °F
240°C464 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

160°C320 °F
110°C230 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

40%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
260°C500 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.3
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.0013

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 175 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
15 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
320°C608 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 1.2%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

330 MJ/kg141,875 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,157 kJ/m³
740 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEKKPPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEKKPPS
3D printingYes—
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, UV Coating.

PEKK vs PPS — frequently asked

Is PEKK stronger than PPS?

Yes. PEKK has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for PPS — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) vs 78 MPa (11.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEKK or PPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PEKK or PPS?

PEKK. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for PPS.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEKK and PPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.