FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK vs PEKK

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK and PEKK are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PEEK is the stronger of the two: yield strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for PEKK, about 5% more; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 95 MPa (13.8 ksi). PEEK is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 8% for PEKK. PEKK is stiffer (3.9 GPa vs 3.7 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK machines more easily (very good vs good) and PEKK welds better (good vs fair).

PEEKChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PEKKChoose it when it will be welded.

PEEK vs PEKK: properties

PEEKPEKK

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.7 GPa0.54 Msi
3.9 GPa0.57 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
7 GPa0.94 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
8%

Compressive Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Flexural Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
3.9 GPa0.57 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

75 J/m1.4 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

99 HRM
100 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Compressive Strength 130 MPa18.9 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in · Hardness, Shore D 86 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Temperature (Tm)

343°C649 °F
332°C630 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

143°C289 °F
162°C324 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.5%

Same in both: Density 1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
48 µm/m·K26.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
240°C464 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

315°C599 °F
175°C347 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

152°C306 °F
160°C320 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

315°C599 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

35%
40%

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.003
0.004

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

150 V
175 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 1.2% · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 380°C716 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
330 MJ/kg141,875 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

15 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

77 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.8 MN·m/kg
3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,351 kJ/m³
1,157 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEKPEKK

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEKPEKK
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionVirginUnfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Spray PaintingYes—

Both are offered for 3D printing. They share 10 finishes: Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

PEEK vs PEKK — frequently asked

Is PEEK stronger than PEKK?

Yes. PEEK has a typical yield strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for PEKK — about 5% more. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 95 MPa (13.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEEK or PEKK?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK or PEKK?

PEEK. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for PEKK; for welding the order is PEKK first (good, 55/100) then PEEK (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK and PEKK side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.