FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-ESD

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-450G and PEEK-ESD are both polymer grades. PEEK-450G is the stronger of the two: yield strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 88 MPa (12.8 ksi) for PEEK-ESD, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi). PEEK-450G is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 6% for PEEK-ESD. PEEK-450G is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.42 g/cm³ for PEEK-ESD) and PEEK-ESD is stiffer (4.2 GPa vs 3.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK-450G machines more easily (very good vs good) and PEEK-450G welds better (good vs fair).

PEEK-450GChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-ESD: properties

PEEK-450GPEEK-ESD

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
6%

Compressive Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Flexural Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.1 GPa0.59 Msi
4.3 GPa0.62 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

6.5 MPa·√m5.9 ksi·√in
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

99 HRM
100 HRM

Same in both: Compressive Strength 125 MPa18.1 ksi · Shear Strength 55 MPa8 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell R 126 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.14%

Refractive Index

1.65
—

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 143°C289 °F · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.45%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.42 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

290°C554 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

152°C306 °F
158°C316 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
305°C581 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 35% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 310°C590 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
10,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.003
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1,000,000 Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10⁷ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

150 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
1.1%

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
2.5 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 380°C716 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

77 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.9 MN·m/kg
3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,316 kJ/m³
922 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK-ESDPEEK-450G

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-450GPEEK-ESD
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-ESD — frequently asked

Is PEEK-450G stronger than PEEK-ESD?

Yes. PEEK-450G has a typical yield strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 88 MPa (12.8 ksi) for PEEK-ESD — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEEK-450G or PEEK-ESD?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-450G or PEEK-ESD?

PEEK-450G. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for PEEK-ESD; for welding the order is PEEK-450G first (good, 55/100) then PEEK-ESD (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-450G and PEEK-ESD side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.