FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-CF30 vs PEEK-ESD

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-CF30 and PEEK-ESD are both polymer grades. PEEK-CF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for PEEK-ESD, about 161% more. In exchange, PEEK-ESD is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 1.7% for PEEK-CF30. PEEK-CF30 is stiffer (24 GPa vs 4.2 GPa) and PEEK-CF30 conducts heat better (0.9 W/m·K vs 0.42 W/m·K).

PEEK-CF30Choose it when strength drives the design.

PEEK-ESDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PEEK-CF30 vs PEEK-ESD: properties

PEEK-CF30PEEK-ESD

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

24 GPa3.5 Msi
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.7%
6%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

16 GPa2.3 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Flexural Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Flexural Modulus

20 GPa2.9 Msi
4.3 GPa0.62 Msi

Shear Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

105 HRM
100 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
126 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.08%
0.14%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.3%
0.45%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 143°C289 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.9 W/m·K0.52 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.42 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
250°C482 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

340°C644 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

315°C599 °F
158°C316 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
305°C581 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 35% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 310°C590 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

100 Ω·m3.94×10⁹ µΩ·in
10,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹¹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

10,000 Ω·cm
1,000,000 Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

100,000 Ω
1×10⁷ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.1%

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
2.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

385°C725 °F
380°C716 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

167 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK-ESD

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-CF30PEEK-ESD
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-CF30 vs PEEK-ESD — frequently asked

Is PEEK-CF30 stronger than PEEK-ESD?

Yes. PEEK-CF30 has a typical tensile strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for PEEK-ESD — about 161% more.

Which is cheaper, PEEK-CF30 or PEEK-ESD?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-CF30 or PEEK-ESD?

PEEK-ESD, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PEEK-CF30; for welding the order is PEEK-ESD first (fair, 40/100) then PEEK-CF30 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-CF30 and PEEK-ESD side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.