FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-Bearing-Grade

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-450G and PEEK-Bearing-Grade are both polymer grades. PEEK-Bearing-Grade is the stronger of the two: yield strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK-450G, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 100 MPa (14.5 ksi). In exchange, PEEK-450G is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 2.5% for PEEK-Bearing-Grade. PEEK-450G is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.44 g/cm³ for PEEK-Bearing-Grade) and PEEK-Bearing-Grade is stiffer (7.7 GPa vs 3.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK-450G machines more easily (very good vs good) and PEEK-450G welds better (good vs poor).

PEEK-450GChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEEK-Bearing-GradeChoose it when strength drives the design.

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-Bearing-Grade: properties

PEEK-450GPEEK-Bearing-Grade

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
7.7 GPa1.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Flexural Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.1 GPa0.59 Msi
7.2 GPa1 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

6.5 MPa·√m5.9 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

99 HRM
100 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.44 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

143°C289 °F
150°C302 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.4%

Refractive Index

1.65
—

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.12%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.9 W/m·K0.52 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

290°C554 °F
325°C617 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

152°C306 °F
300°C572 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
320°C608 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 35% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 310°C590 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.003
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
100,000 Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
100,000 Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

150 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 380°C716 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

77 kN·m/kg
90 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.9 MN·m/kg
5.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,316 kJ/m³
859 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK-Bearing-GradePEEK-450G

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-450GPEEK-Bearing-Grade
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-Bearing-Grade — frequently asked

Is PEEK-Bearing-Grade stronger than PEEK-450G?

Yes. PEEK-Bearing-Grade has a typical yield strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK-450G — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 100 MPa (14.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEEK-450G or PEEK-Bearing-Grade?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-450G or PEEK-Bearing-Grade?

PEEK-450G. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for PEEK-Bearing-Grade; for welding the order is PEEK-450G first (good, 55/100) then PEEK-Bearing-Grade (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-450G and PEEK-Bearing-Grade side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.