FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-Bearing-Grade vs PEEK-ESD

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-Bearing-Grade and PEEK-ESD are both polymer grades. PEEK-Bearing-Grade is the stronger of the two: yield strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 88 MPa (12.8 ksi) for PEEK-ESD, about 31% more; tensile strength follows at 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi). In exchange, PEEK-ESD is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 2.5% for PEEK-Bearing-Grade. PEEK-Bearing-Grade is stiffer (7.7 GPa vs 4.2 GPa) and PEEK-Bearing-Grade conducts heat better (0.9 W/m·K vs 0.42 W/m·K). On the shop floor, PEEK-ESD welds better (fair vs poor).

PEEK-Bearing-GradeChoose it when strength drives the design.

PEEK-ESDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PEEK-Bearing-Grade vs PEEK-ESD: properties

PEEK-Bearing-GradePEEK-ESD

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

7.7 GPa1.1 Msi
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Shear Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
6%

Compressive Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Flexural Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Flexural Modulus

7.2 GPa1 Msi
4.3 GPa0.62 Msi

Shear Strength

68 MPa9.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

87 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
126 HRR

Same in both: Izod Impact, Notched 45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in · Hardness, Rockwell M 100 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.44 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

150°C302 °F
143°C289 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.14%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.4%
0.45%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.9 W/m·K0.52 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.42 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F
1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

325°C617 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

300°C572 °F
158°C316 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

320°C608 °F
305°C581 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 35% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 310°C590 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹⁰ µΩ·in
10,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹¹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

100,000 Ω·cm
1,000,000 Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

100,000 Ω
1×10⁷ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.1%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
2.5 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 380°C716 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.3 MN·m/kg
3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

859 kJ/m³
922 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.5 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK-Bearing-GradePEEK-ESD

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-Bearing-GradePEEK-ESD
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-Bearing-Grade vs PEEK-ESD — frequently asked

Is PEEK-Bearing-Grade stronger than PEEK-ESD?

Yes. PEEK-Bearing-Grade has a typical yield strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 88 MPa (12.8 ksi) for PEEK-ESD — about 31% more. Tensile strength is 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEEK-Bearing-Grade or PEEK-ESD?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-Bearing-Grade or PEEK-ESD?

PEEK-ESD, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PEEK-Bearing-Grade; for welding the order is PEEK-ESD first (fair, 40/100) then PEEK-Bearing-Grade (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-Bearing-Grade and PEEK-ESD side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.