FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-450G vs PEK

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-450G and PEK are both polymer grades. PEK is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK-450G, about 10% more. In exchange, PEEK-450G is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for PEK. PEK is stiffer (4 GPa vs 3.8 GPa).

PEEK-450GChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PEKChoose it when strength drives the design.

PEEK-450G vs PEK: properties

PEEK-450GPEK

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
25%

Compressive Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Flexural Modulus

4.1 GPa0.59 Msi
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

6.5 MPa·√m5.9 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

99 HRM
100 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
—

Same in both: Flexural Strength 165 MPa23.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Temperature (Tm)

343°C649 °F
373°C703 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

143°C289 °F
157°C315 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.1%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.4%

Refractive Index

1.65
—

Same in both: Density 1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

290°C554 °F
320°C608 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

152°C306 °F
165°C329 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

35%
40%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

310°C590 °F
320°C608 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.3

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.003 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
1.3%

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
400°C752 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Weldability 55 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
22 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

77 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.9 MN·m/kg
3.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,316 kJ/m³
1,378 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEKPEEK-450G

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-450GPEK
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-450G vs PEK — frequently asked

Is PEK stronger than PEEK-450G?

Yes. PEK has a typical tensile strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK-450G — about 10% more.

Which is cheaper, PEEK-450G or PEK?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-450G or PEK?

PEEK-450G. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (65/100) for PEK.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-450G and PEK side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.