FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-450G and PEEK-GF30 are both polymer grades. PEEK-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK-450G, about 65% more. In exchange, PEEK-450G is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 2.5% for PEEK-GF30. PEEK-450G is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.51 g/cm³ for PEEK-GF30) and PEEK-GF30 is stiffer (10 GPa vs 3.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK-450G machines more easily (very good vs fair) and PEEK-450G welds better (good vs fair).

PEEK-450GChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEEK-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design.

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-GF30: properties

PEEK-450GPEEK-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
10 GPa1.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

45%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.1 GPa0.59 Msi
9.7 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

6.5 MPa·√m5.9 ksi·√in
5 MPa·√m4.6 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

99 HRM
102 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.51 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.11%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.4%

Refractive Index

1.65
—

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 143°C289 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.43 W/m·K0.25 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
260°C500 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

290°C554 °F
340°C644 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

152°C306 °F
315°C599 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

35%
38%

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
330°C626 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 310°C590 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.003
0.005

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
93 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 380°C716 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

77 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.9 MN·m/kg
6.6 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK-450G

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-450GPEEK-GF30
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-450G vs PEEK-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PEEK-GF30 stronger than PEEK-450G?

Yes. PEEK-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK-450G — about 65% more.

Which is cheaper, PEEK-450G or PEEK-GF30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-450G or PEEK-GF30?

PEEK-450G. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against fair (45/100) for PEEK-GF30; for welding the order is PEEK-450G first (good, 55/100) then PEEK-GF30 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-450G and PEEK-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.