FabDigitFabDigit

PDLLA vs TPS

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLLA and TPS are both polymer grades. PDLLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for TPS, about 8.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 8 MPa (1.16 ksi). In exchange, TPS is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 5% for PDLLA, and PDLLA is harder (82 Shore D vs 48 Shore D). PDLLA is lighter (1.25 g/cm³ vs 1.32 g/cm³ for TPS) and PDLLA is stiffer (3 GPa vs 0.25 GPa). On the shop floor, PDLLA machines more easily (good vs fair), TPS welds better (65 vs 55 out of 100), and TPS sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PDLLA (high, $$$$).

PDLLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

TPSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PDLLA vs TPS: properties

PDLLATPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
60%

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
0.3 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
48 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
92 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
30 kN/m171 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.32 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
10°C50 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
35%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
60%

Refractive Index

1.46
1.5

Light Transmission

90%
82%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
150°C302 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

45°C113 °F
50°C122 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
45°C113 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

57°C135 °F
60°C140 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

60°C140 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa 55°C131 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 22%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.013
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹¹ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
20 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.6%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
1.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
6 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.4 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
72 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLLATPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLLATPS
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLLA vs TPS — frequently asked

Is PDLLA stronger than TPS?

Yes. PDLLA has a typical yield strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for TPS — about 8.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 8 MPa (1.16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLLA or TPS?

TPS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PDLLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLLA or TPS?

PDLLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for TPS; for welding the order is TPS first (good, 65/100) then PDLLA (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLLA and TPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.