FabDigitFabDigit

PDLLA vs PHBV

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLLA and PHBV are both polymer grades. PDLLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for PHBV, about 92% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 27 MPa (3.92 ksi). In exchange, PHBV is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 5% for PDLLA, and PDLLA is harder (82 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). PDLLA is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.8 GPa) and PHBV runs hotter in service (95°C vs 45°C continuous). On the shop floor, PHBV sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PDLLA (high, $$$$).

PDLLAChoose it when strength drives the design.

PHBVChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PDLLA vs PHBV: properties

PDLLAPHBV

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
1.8 GPa0.26 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
27 MPa3.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
8%

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
75 Shore D

Shear Modulus

—
0.65 GPa0.09 Msi

Same in both: Hardness, Rockwell R 95 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Glass Transition (Tg)

55°C131 °F
2°C36 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1%

Refractive Index

1.46
1.5

Light Transmission

90%
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
155°C311 °F

Same in both: Density 1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

45°C113 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

55°C131 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

57°C135 °F
140°C284 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

60°C140 °F
120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.013
0.01

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
170°C338 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
55°C131 °F

Same in both: Weldability 55 / 100 · Melt Flow Rate 10 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
22 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.4 MN·m/kg
1.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

384 kJ/m³
174 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLLAPHBV

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLLAPHBV
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLLA vs PHBV — frequently asked

Is PDLLA stronger than PHBV?

Yes. PDLLA has a typical yield strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for PHBV — about 92% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 27 MPa (3.92 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLLA or PHBV?

PHBV is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PDLLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLLA or PHBV?

PDLLA, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for PHBV.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLLA and PHBV side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.