FabDigitFabDigit

PDLA vs TPS

Polymer · grade comparison

PDLA and TPS are both polymer grades. PDLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for TPS, about 9.7 times as much; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 8 MPa (1.16 ksi). In exchange, TPS is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 4% for PDLA, and PDLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 48 Shore D). PDLA is lighter (1.25 g/cm³ vs 1.32 g/cm³ for TPS) and PDLA is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 0.25 GPa). On the shop floor, PDLA machines more easily (good vs fair) and TPS sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PDLA (high, $$$$).

PDLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

TPSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PDLA vs TPS: properties

PDLATPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.57 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
60%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
0.3 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in
40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

83 Shore D
48 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
92 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
30 kN/m171 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.32 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

178°C352 °F
150°C302 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
10°C50 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
35%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
60%

Refractive Index

1.455
1.5

Light Transmission

90%
82%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,590 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

53°C127 °F
45°C113 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

59°C138 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
22%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 50°C122 °F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹¹ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.6%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
1.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
6 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

510 kJ/m³
72 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePDLATPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPDLATPS
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PDLA vs TPS — frequently asked

Is PDLA stronger than TPS?

Yes. PDLA has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for TPS — about 9.7 times as much. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 8 MPa (1.16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PDLA or TPS?

TPS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PDLA is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PDLA or TPS?

PDLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for TPS; for welding the order is TPS first (good, 65/100) then PDLA (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PDLA and TPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.