FabDigitFabDigit

PCTFE vs PVF

Polymer · grade comparison

PCTFE and PVF are both polymer grades. PVF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) for PCTFE, about 32% more; tensile strength follows at 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) vs 37 MPa (5.37 ksi). PVF is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 110% for PCTFE. PVF is lighter (1.45 g/cm³ vs 2.12 g/cm³ for PCTFE) and PVF is stiffer (2.2 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PCTFE machines more easily (very good vs poor), PVF welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and PVF sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

PCTFEChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

PVFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PCTFE vs PVF: properties

PCTFEPVF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

37 MPa5.4 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

110%
150%

Compressive Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
—

Shear Strength

33 MPa4.8 ksi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
—

Tear Strength

—
8 kN/m45.7 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

212°C414 °F
200°C392 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
40°C104 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
1.5%

Refractive Index

1.43
1.46

Light Transmission

—
92%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
50 µm/m·K27.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

135°C275 °F
107°C225 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

126°C259 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

78°C172 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
175°C347 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
140 kV/mm3,556 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
0.06

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
98 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
1.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

385 kJ/m³
460 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEPVF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTFEPVF
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PCTFE vs PVF — frequently asked

Is PVF stronger than PCTFE?

Yes. PVF has a typical yield strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) for PCTFE — about 32% more. Tensile strength is 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) vs 37 MPa (5.37 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCTFE or PVF?

PVF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCTFE or PVF?

PCTFE. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against poor (30/100) for PVF; for welding the order is PVF first (poor, 30/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCTFE and PVF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.