FabDigitFabDigit

ETFE vs PCTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

ETFE and PCTFE are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for ETFE, about 55% more. In exchange, ETFE is the more ductile: elongation 320% versus 110% for PCTFE, and PCTFE is harder (78 Shore D vs 73 Shore D). ETFE is lighter (1.73 g/cm³ vs 2.12 g/cm³ for PCTFE) and PCTFE is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 0.85 GPa). On the shop floor, ETFE welds better (very good vs poor) and ETFE sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

ETFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design.

ETFE vs PCTFE: properties

ETFEPCTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
37 MPa5.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
110%

Compressive Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

1,000 J/m18.7 ft·lbf/in
145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

73 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
112 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Shear Strength

—
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.73 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

265°C509 °F
212°C414 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
50°C122 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.03%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.403
1.43

Light Transmission

92%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

95 µm/m·K52.8 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
135°C275 °F

Min Service Temperature

-190°C-310 °F
-240°C-400 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

104°C219 °F
126°C259 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

74°C165 °F
78°C172 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

31%
95%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
180°C356 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.6
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.006
0.014

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

3.5%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

320°C608 °F
290°C554 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 120°C248 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb
240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.5 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

285 kJ/m³
385 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEETFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityETFEPCTFE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ETFE vs PCTFE — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than ETFE?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for ETFE — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ETFE or PCTFE?

ETFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ETFE or PCTFE?

PCTFE. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (62/100) for ETFE; for welding the order is ETFE first (very good, 80/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ETFE and PCTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.