FabDigitFabDigit

FEP vs PVF

Polymer · grade comparison

FEP and PVF are both polymer grades. PVF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP, about 3.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi). In exchange, FEP is the more ductile: elongation 320% versus 150% for PVF. PVF is lighter (1.45 g/cm³ vs 2.15 g/cm³ for FEP) and PVF is stiffer (2.2 GPa vs 0.48 GPa). On the shop floor, FEP machines more easily (good vs poor), FEP welds better (very good vs poor), and PVF sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than FEP (specialty, $$$$$).

FEPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PVFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

FEP vs PVF: properties

FEPPVF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.48 GPa0.07 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.18 GPa0.03 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

23 MPa3.3 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
150%

Compressive Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

2,700 J/m50.6 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

56 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

25 HRR
—

Tear Strength

—
8 kN/m45.7 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

260°C500 °F
200°C392 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-90°C-130 °F
40°C104 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
1.5%

Refractive Index

1.344
1.46

Light Transmission

95%
92%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
50 µm/m·K27.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
107°C225 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

51°C124 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

230°C446 °F
175°C347 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
140 kV/mm3,556 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.1
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

6×10⁻⁴
0.06

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

98 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 98 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4%
—

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb
170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
1.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

176 kJ/m³
460 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFEPPVF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFEPPVF
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

FEP vs PVF — frequently asked

Is PVF stronger than FEP?

Yes. PVF has a typical yield strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for FEP — about 3.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) vs 23 MPa (3.34 ksi).

Which is cheaper, FEP or PVF?

PVF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while FEP is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, FEP or PVF?

FEP. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for PVF; for welding the order is FEP first (very good, 80/100) then PVF (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FEP and PVF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.