FabDigitFabDigit

PC-ABS vs SAN

Polymer · grade comparison

PC-ABS and SAN are both polymer grades. SAN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for PC-ABS, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) vs 56 MPa (8.12 ksi). In exchange, PC-ABS is the more ductile: elongation 90% versus 3% for SAN, and SAN is harder (84 Shore D vs 79 Shore D). SAN is lighter (1.07 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for PC-ABS) and SAN is stiffer (3.6 GPa vs 2.4 GPa).

PC-ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

SANChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PC-ABS vs SAN: properties

PC-ABSSAN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.87 GPa0.13 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.52 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

56 MPa8.1 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

55 MPa8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

90%
3%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
1.5 MPa·√m1.4 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

500 J/m9.4 ft·lbf/in
21 J/m0.39 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

79 Shore D
84 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

68 HRM
80 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.07 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

125°C257 °F
106°C223 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.9%

Refractive Index

—
1.571

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

120°C248 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

105°C221 °F
90°C194 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

135°C275 °F
105°C221 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

23%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

125°C257 °F
95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.9

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.008 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
32 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
88 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

14 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

265°C509 °F
240°C464 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

75°C167 °F
65°C149 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
3.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

630 kJ/m³
681 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-ABSSAN

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC-ABSSAN
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PC-ABS vs SAN — frequently asked

Is SAN stronger than PC-ABS?

Yes. SAN has a typical yield strength of 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for PC-ABS — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) vs 56 MPa (8.12 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC-ABS or SAN?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PC-ABS or SAN?

PC-ABS, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for SAN.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC-ABS and SAN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.