FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs SAN

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and SAN are both polymer grades. SAN is the stronger of the two: yield strength 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). In exchange, ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 3% for SAN, and SAN is harder (84 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). SAN is stiffer (3.6 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good) and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than SAN (standard, $$).

ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

SANChoose it when strength drives the design.

ABS vs SAN: properties

ABSSAN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
3%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
1.5 MPa·√m1.4 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
21 J/m0.39 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
84 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
120 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
80 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.35

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.07 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
106°C223 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.9%

Refractive Index

—
1.571

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
90°C194 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
105°C221 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
19%

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 95°C203 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.008

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.9 · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
32 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
240°C464 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
65°C149 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
3.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
681 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSSAN

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSSAN
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs SAN — frequently asked

Is SAN stronger than ABS?

Yes. SAN has a typical yield strength of 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or SAN?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while SAN is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or SAN?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (60/100) for SAN; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then SAN (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and SAN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.