FabDigitFabDigit

PAI vs PEEK

Polymer · grade comparison

PAI and PEEK are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PAI is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 152 MPa (22 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK, about 52% more. In exchange, PEEK is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 15% for PAI. PEEK is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.42 g/cm³ for PAI) and PAI is stiffer (4.5 GPa vs 3.7 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK machines more easily (very good vs good) and PEEK welds better (fair vs not recommended).

PAIChoose it when strength drives the design.

PEEKChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PAI vs PEEK: properties

PAIPEEK

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

4.5 GPa0.65 Msi
3.7 GPa0.54 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

152 MPa22 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
30%

Compressive Strength

166 MPa24.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Flexural Strength

244 MPa35.4 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.8 GPa0.7 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Shear Strength

128 MPa18.6 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

137 J/m2.6 ft·lbf/in
75 J/m1.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

110 HRM
99 HRM

Bulk Modulus

—
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
126 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

275°C527 °F
143°C289 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.28%
0.12%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

5%
0.45%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
343°C649 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

31 µm/m·K17.2 µin/in·°F
47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

282°C540 °F
315°C599 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

278°C532 °F
152°C306 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
35%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

280°C536 °F
300°C572 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
315°C599 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.9
3.2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.003

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

200 V
150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.7%
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
380°C716 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
180°C356 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
3 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb
290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
15 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
77 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3.2 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEKPAI

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPAIPEEK
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionUnfilled (Electrical)Virgin
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PAI vs PEEK — frequently asked

Is PAI stronger than PEEK?

Yes. PAI has a typical tensile strength of 152 MPa (22 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for PEEK — about 52% more.

Which is cheaper, PAI or PEEK?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PAI or PEEK?

PEEK. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for PAI; for welding the order is PEEK first (fair, 45/100) then PAI (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PAI and PEEK side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.