FabDigitFabDigit

PAI vs PPS

Polymer · grade comparison

PAI and PPS are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PAI is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 152 MPa (22 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PPS, about 95% more. PAI is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 5% for PPS. PPS is lighter (1.35 g/cm³ vs 1.42 g/cm³ for PAI) and PAI is stiffer (4.5 GPa vs 3.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PPS welds better (poor vs not recommended).

PAIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PPSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

PAI vs PPS: properties

PAIPPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

4.5 GPa0.65 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

152 MPa22 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
5%

Compressive Strength

166 MPa24.1 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Flexural Strength

244 MPa35.4 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.8 GPa0.7 Msi
3.9 GPa0.57 Msi

Shear Strength

128 MPa18.6 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

137 J/m2.6 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

110 HRM
95 HRM

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
123 HRR

Same in both: Hardness, Shore D 88 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

275°C527 °F
88°C190 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.28%
0.03%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

5%
0.1%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
280°C536 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

31 µm/m·K17.2 µin/in·°F
52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
220°C428 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

282°C540 °F
240°C464 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

278°C532 °F
110°C230 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

280°C536 °F
260°C500 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.9
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.0013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

200 V
175 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

10 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.7%
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
320°C608 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100 · Formability (cold) 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3.2 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPSPAI

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPAIPPS
Default conditionUnfilled (Electrical)Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PAI vs PPS — frequently asked

Is PAI stronger than PPS?

Yes. PAI has a typical tensile strength of 152 MPa (22 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PPS — about 95% more.

Which is cheaper, PAI or PPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PAI or PPS?

PPS. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (10/100) for PAI.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PAI and PPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.