FabDigitFabDigit

PA6 vs PA612

Polymer · grade comparison

PA6 and PA612 are both polymer grades. PA6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PA612, about 29% more; tensile strength follows at 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi). In exchange, PA612 is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 60% for PA6. PA612 is lighter (1.07 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA6) and PA6 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, PA6 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PA612 (premium, $$$).

PA6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PA612Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA6 vs PA612: properties

PA6PA612

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.78 GPa0.11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.65 Msi
4 GPa0.51 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
120%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Shear Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Shore D

81 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

82 HRM
78 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

119 HRR
115 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39 · Izod Impact, Notched 55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.07 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

220°C428 °F
218°C424 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

58°C136 °F
48°C118 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.7%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

9%
2.7%

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

170°C338 °F
160°C320 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

65°C149 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

190°C374 °F
185°C365 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

150°C302 °F
160°C320 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 24%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.7
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.025
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
72 / 100

Weldability

62 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
1.3%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
—

Same in both: Formability (cold) 60 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 260°C500 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 80°C176 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.6 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

938 kJ/m³
801 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA6PA612

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA6PA612
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PA6 vs PA612 — frequently asked

Is PA6 stronger than PA612?

Yes. PA6 has a typical yield strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PA612 — about 29% more. Tensile strength is 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA6 or PA612?

PA6 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PA612 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PA6 or PA612?

PA612. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (62/100) for PA6.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA6 and PA612 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.